BABY
SAPIR-WHORF
The baby discovers himself in
the universe. He feels no fear,
no anxiety (assuming he
isn't hungry), and identifies his
being with all that he sees. As yet the perception of
identity,
precursor of the verb "be", is a matrix of features whose
symbols
are indistinct, but the import of the matrix itself is
that sense
of identity, of sensual and perceptual one-ness with the
universe.
The baby is, as it were, the universe looking in on itself.
When the baby experiences hunger the identity with the
pleasant
and amorphous universe is broken. A crack appears in the
continuity between baby and world, between his face which
he can
not see and the out-there of his nursery. His cry startles
him.
The world blurs. It is a swelling tear. The tear is a
prism,
and the universe melts in color. His cry shakes the tear,
the universe quivers, and a soft mass, his fist, wipes
it off.
The universe reappears, seemingly farther away, unrelenting,
unresponsive.
The baby has made his second discovery: the negative.
BE and BE NOT.
Perhaps, for a moment, he gasps, sucks in his cry, his
tears
vaporize in the
hot wonder of the revelation: the brutal duality
BE/BE NOT (or IS/IS NOT)
stultifies his hunger. For a moment. The sound of his
cry,
by the difference from his pleasant babbling, gives significance,
a fiercer reality, to both.
The soothing quality of his tranquil voice entertains
him.
He imitates the strange beings who constantly hover over
him,
touch him, feed him, always smiling. He smiles too.
Now the sounds he makes are with a smile, his lips spread
wide,
and closing, opening:
". . pa . . .ba . . . ma . . .wa .
."
The world has beguiled him to utter the sounds, rising
in his
throat and tickling his lips, that will divide and coalesce
into the pregnant symbols of his language.
First it is names, symbols of things that he can see and
touch
and taste, that he learns. The creatures who feed him,
the thing
he eats, and himself. Simple words that begin the relentless
isolation of his universe, taking the infinite, undifferentiated
plenum of his nursery and wrapping parts of it, the parts
that
move or touch him or taste, with skins of sound.
Later, he will hear the symbols side by side and somehow
realize
new meanings that are not in the symbols themselves but
in the
bundle of relations that flash between the symbols,
like electricity flowing between dumb terminals possessed
of no
intrinsic power.
Syntax stirs and stretches out of the tight bed of words.
"Mama loves baby."
"Loves" is first the soothing touch of the mother.
Then he anticipates it. Her hands start movement, still
in space,
not yet on him, already he gleams, and "loves" takes a
tilt
into abstraction: now it begins away from him, redefines
itself
in the intangible motion that culminates on his joy.
But always the word will have a curiously intimate meaning;
beyond all the symbols he will learn in his life (paler
and more
sophisticated synonyms), it will stir him, like the sudden
remembrance of a lost precocity.
"Baby loves baby."
and
"Baby loves sister."
and
"Mama loves sister."
And then baby sees Mama hit sister, both with unsmiling
expressions, and
he hears the continuous, sharp syntax of pain,
the cry, the dizzy whimper.
The universe takes a spin in opposite directions.
When it stops, in a minute or two, Mama is smiling again,
but the room, the walls, the air with the trembling motes
of dust, Mama's face, have not meshed perfectly; there
is
a crack that seems to thread across everything.
What was whole is now confused. The crack exposes the
first
two pieces of a giant puzzle that has come into being
because
"Mama loves sister."
for an immovable moment, was not true.
It did not apply to Mama's action, which contradicted
the terrible
importance of the sentence. The sentence has caused the
universe
to shake, to spin, to crack all around, to begin in the
morning
with slightly crooked beams of light, to end in a tilted
darkness.
And "love", the touch, the sound, the word, gyrates in
the baby's
mind, wobbling through shades of meaning, each shade retouching
the world, shedding patinas of disintegration on things
once
bright, firm, eternal.
"Love" and the universe, both nameless at first, too immediate
and ecstatic to be bothered with self-reflecting images,
were One.
"Love" wrapped
"Mama loves sister."
in a seamless circuit of elemental unity, with infinite
symmetries
and substitutions:
"Sister loves Mama."
"Baby loves sister."
"Sister loves baby."
"Baby loves Universe."
"Universe loves baby."
"Love", above focused in the word, binds together the
symbols
of an endless chain of possibilities, like a mirror set
between
two things that reflects both of them on a common surface,
joining separate existences, creating the syntax that
makes
the juxtaposition possible.
So the mother's blow, beyond the simple physical act,
strikes,
not on one, but on the endless conjunctions of sentences
that
wind through the universe. The blow strikes on the word
that
empowers the unity of the chain, on "love", and the cracking
of the word flashes in the chain, the crack the baby sees
opening
through everything.
"Love", split into parts, reflects into the universe the
puzzle
that it has become. And the universe, there in the nursery,
in the grinning faces, in the equivocal action of the
strangers,
flickers out of its freshness, takes a twist into shades
of meaning, becomes nostalgic, intense, philosophical.
Baby lifts his hands in front of his eyes to wipe away
the
ambiguity blurring his vision.
The little fingers play in the air, the soft knuckles
beat
against the suspended toy, which chimes and whirls.
He blinks, rubs his eyes. The blur remains.
It is inside him.
Above him, mother whispers, "Mama loves baby."
He squints at her.
feedback
top
literature
directory
hotpiehot's
next dream
© hotpiehot@hotmail.com